When I started with the nonprofit Phoenix House right out of college, I was an idealist. I pursued any program and every grant that would help our clients. I believed success would come from the quantity of grants submitted. Now, with nearly three decades of experience, I am much more of a pragmatist. I realized that you cannot chase every opportunity, but yet, you also need to be open to possibilities. Either way, you need a system to ensure that you are practical about the pursuit and focused on results over effort.

Sustainability has become the buzzword in the social sector. Sustainability happens on three different levels: 

 
  • Programmatic: Your organization has a sophisticated program development process to move from innovation to impact and scale AND you are responsive to both community and client needs.
  • Financial: Your organization generates resources to support its needs without compromising its future. 
  • Organizational: Your organization is able to adapt and change
 
In making decisions about programs and grants, you need two approaches: 1) a proactive approach that allows you to intentionally raise money to support innovative programs and needs and 2) a more reactive approach that allows you to be opportunistic and strategically pursue interests that are aligned with your mission. Taken together, this creates a grant decision-making system that helps you move away from feeling like you are chasing money and move toward building a purposeful process that ensures that your important programs flourish.
 
Most of us are familiar with the reactive approach – applying for grants. However, we have found that most organizations do not have an annual process to assist them with a proactive approach. Our favorite tool to accomplish this goal is the Mission-Money Matrix. Often in the social sector, just like in the movie “Field of Dreams,” we fall in love with our program and assume “if we build it, they will come.” Even if this is true and people come, we need to ensure that money follows. This is why the Mission-Money Matrix is a great tool for evaluating where your organization stands and determining where you want it to go.  
 

Based on the Boston Consulting Group Project Matrix, the Mission-Money Matrix, is a visual tool that allows you to understand, discuss and strategically decide where it is best to pursue grants to support programs. The steps are straightforward:

 
  • First, identify your portfolio, which can include possible programs and even fundraising events.
  • Second, calculate net financial return – be sure to include both direct and indirect costs. We have found that a breakeven analysis is the easiest way to produce a relative assessment in the portfolio. 
  • Third, evaluate mission impact – such as alignment, impact and reach (often found in your logic model). We have found that an A-F score is the easiest way to produce a relative assessment.
  • Fourth, plot on the matrix with financial return on the horizontal and mission impact on the vertical.
 

When you reveal where each program falls, you can determine the best next steps to strengthen your position:

 
  • On the top right, you have the perfect mix of high mission impact and high financial return programs – the Stars. You want to invest and grow these programs as well as attract attention to them.
  • On the top left, you have high mission impact but low financial return programs – the Hearts. You want to find ways to control costs and limit financial risk for these programs as well as seek grants to subsidize them. You can afford some Hearts, but not many.
  • On the bottom right, you have low mission impact, but high financial return programs – the Money Trees. You want to find ways to boost impact and grow these programs. 
  • On the bottom left, you have low mission impact and low financial return programs – the Question Marks. You may need to evaluate the role of these programs in the portfolio and either work to improve their value or consider divesting them to another agency.
 
The goal is a portfolio mix that leverages different funding streams and maximizes impact for your clients and community. Through this process, you can increase program stability and reduce the impact of funding volatility. 
 
This process also makes it clear where grant funding is needed to support the program’s and organization’s sustainability, which should also be connected to the fundraising plan as well as staff performance objectives. The Matrix brings clarity to this discussion and creates a proactive strategy to build a grant pipeline that supports your organization’s most important work and, ultimately, a more sustainable way of doing business. 
 
We recommend that this process be conducted annually – ideally in the last few months of the fiscal year. This will help you develop a cohesive program and fundraising plan for the next year and set budget projections that are tied to an analytical framework and dashboard that can be tracked throughout the fiscal year. We would love to hear how you make more proactive programming decisions in your organization and if the Matrix is helpful to you.

 

Sign up to receive the Social TrendSpotter e-newsletter
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Plusone Email